couponscros.blogg.se

Subvocalization versus auditory imagery
Subvocalization versus auditory imagery













subvocalization versus auditory imagery

Rate-induced resyllabification revisited. Journal of Memory & Language, 45, 177–199.ĭe Jong, K. Boundaries versus onsets in syllabic segmentation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Ĭontent, A., Kearns, R. Beckman (Eds.), Between the grammar and the physics of speech (Papers in Laboratory Phonology, Vol. The role of the sonority cycle in core syllabification. Can mental images be ambiguous? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 11, 317–328.Ĭlements, G. Articulatory gestures as phonological units. Vatikiotis-Bateson (Eds.), Festschrift Christian Benoît.

SUBVOCALIZATION VERSUS AUDITORY IMAGERY FOR FREE

Some insights in bimodal perception given for free by the natural time course of speech production. The absence of the asymmetric bias during a purely auditory procedure rules out perceptual mechanisms as a possible explanation of the observed asymmetries.Ībry, C., Cathiard, M.-A., Vilain, A., Laboissière, R., & Schwartz, J.-L. The persistence of this effect from an overt to a covert repetition procedure provides evidence that articulatory stability constraints originating from the action system may be involved in auditory imagery. These experiments demonstrate the existence of an asymmetric bias in the verbal transformation effect linked to articulatory control constraints. However, when a purely perceptual condition was used in a fourth experiment, the previously observed perceptual asymmetries of verbal transformations disappeared. In the third experiment, which involved a covert repetition mode, the pattern was maintained without external speech movements. Syllable transformation frequencies followed the temporal clustering between consonantal gestures: The more synchronized the gestures, the more stable and attractive the syllable. In the second experiment, French participants repeatedly uttered these syllables while searching for verbal transformation. The first experiment displayed variations in timing relations between two consonantal gestures embedded in various nonsense syllables in a repetitive speech production task. With this goal in mind, we examined whether variations in the articulatory cohesion of repeated nonsense words-specifically, temporal relationships between articulatory events-could lead to perceptual asymmetries in verbal transformations.

subvocalization versus auditory imagery

Although verbal transformations are considered to reflect mainly the perceptual organization and interpretation of speech, the present study was designed to test whether or not speech production constraints may participate in the emergence of verbal representations. We consider the breadth of the partnership between the inner ear and inner voice, the level that subvocal rehearsal occupies in the cognitive system, and the functional neuroanatomy of the phonological loop system.Perceptual changes are experienced during rapid and continuous repetition of a speech form, leading to an auditory illusion known as the verbal transformation effect. In a fifth experiment (making homophone judgements), subjects hardly even needed to subvocally rehearse, a result suggesting that homophone judgements rely on some direct route from print to phonology. In this case they may have consulted articulatory or kinesthetic cues instead. In a fourth task (distinguishing voiced and unvoiced consonants in imagery), subjects still subvocally rehearsed, but seemed to need no additional phonological store to respond correctly. Apparently subjects subvocally rehearsed the imagery material, which placed the material in a phonological store that allowed the imagery judgement. In three tasks (reinterpreting ambiguous auditory images, parsing meaningful letter strings, scanning familiar melodies) subjects relied on a partnership between the inner ear and inner voice, one similar to the phonological loop system described in the short-term memory literature.

subvocalization versus auditory imagery

Five experiments explored the utility of subvocal rehearsal, and of an inner-ear/inner-voice partnership, in tasks of auditory imagery.















Subvocalization versus auditory imagery